← Back to all articles
Post-ImplementationSMBs

Overcoming Post-Implementation Challenges of ERP Software for Indian SMBs

DigiEn InfoSoft·12 June 2024
Overcoming Post-Implementation Challenges of ERP Software for Indian SMBs

Go-live is not the finish line — it's the beginning of the hard part. The months after an ERP system goes live are when projects succeed or quietly fail. Adoption gaps, process drift, support gaps, and financial pressure can all erode the value of an otherwise solid implementation. This guide covers the most common post-go-live challenges and how to address them.

Low User Adoption — The Silent Implementation Killer

The most expensive ERP in the world delivers zero value if people work around it. Low user adoption is the most common post-implementation failure mode — and it's almost always predictable from the preparation phase. If staff weren't involved in design, weren't trained properly, or don't understand why the system is better for them, they'll revert to their old methods within weeks of go-live.

Signs of low adoption

Data that only gets entered after it's been tracked manually first. Reports that still require manual compilation. Processes that officially happen "in the system" but actually happen on WhatsApp and get entered later as a formality.

The fix

Identify specific individuals with low adoption rates and understand why. Is it training gap? Is the system harder to use than the old method for their specific tasks? Address root causes, not symptoms.

Ongoing Training Needs

ERP systems evolve — features are added, workflows are updated, new modules come online. The training you did at go-live covers the system as it existed then. Training needs to be an ongoing programme, not a one-time event. This is especially true for businesses with significant staff turnover.

Build training materials into the system itself — contextual help, guided workflows, video walkthroughs for common tasks. New users should be able to learn the system primarily from within the system, with support rather than a structured training course as a secondary resource.

Data Entry Errors — Maintaining Data Integrity

The value of an ERP system depends entirely on the quality of the data in it. Inaccurate data leads to inaccurate reports, poor decisions, and loss of confidence in the system. As people trust the system less, they're more likely to check data manually — which defeats the purpose.

Over-Customisation Complications

Customisations that seemed necessary during implementation can become maintenance burdens over time. Every custom piece of code needs to be tested with every system update, maintained when it breaks, and documented so future team members understand it. Review customisations 6 months post go-live — some will have turned out to be unnecessary, and removing them simplifies the system.

Vendor Dependence

If your business can't operate without calling the vendor for every change, the implementation has failed — regardless of whether the software works correctly. A good implementation transfers genuine knowledge to your team. The goal is your people understanding the system, not just being able to use it.

Managing the Payback Period

ERP investments take time to pay back — typically 12 to 36 months for a well-implemented system. During this period, the investment is real but the full benefits haven't yet materialised. Managing expectations at the leadership level, tracking leading indicators of value (adoption rates, process time reductions, error rates), and communicating progress against baseline is how you maintain organisational confidence during this period.

The 90-day post-go-live review

Every ERP implementation should include a formal review at 90 days post go-live. What's working? What's not being used? What processes have drifted back to old methods? What training gaps have emerged? This review, done honestly, is the single most effective intervention for getting implementations back on track before problems become entrenched.